Hi Jeremy, My understanding -- correct me if I'm wrong -- is that even if you use node.js it's going to serve up all the tiddlers on the client side. So it doesn't scale up any better than just a TW file by itself. The performance may not be bad on a desktop machine, but over a phone connection it's going to be noticeable if you have lots of tiddlers.
This is different from a true wiki, where only the tiddlers (or whatever they're called in the wiki world) you're looking at get sent over the net. Thanks! Mark On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 12:34:54 PM UTC-7, Jeremy Ruston wrote: > > > The main issue that we see at the moment is that embedding large > images/PDFs doesn't work well. There are users out there with TiddlyWiki > documents containing up to the tens of thousands of tiddlers. Of course, > there's the Node.js configuration which scales even better (and with some > additional work will scale as well as anything else out there). > > Jeremy Ruston > mailto:jeremy...@gmail.com <javascript:> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TiddlyWiki" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tiddlywiki+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to tiddlywiki@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tiddlywiki. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/tiddlywiki/d507cd28-627b-4231-8d32-e72d66ee3696%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
