Christopher D. Green wrote: I suspect that it is the same kind of fatigue-prompted switching one sees with the Necker Cube. The laterality claim srtikes me as completely bogus.
--------- In the early 90s I used to have my Experimental Psych. students do studies on various cognitive and behavioral aspects of hemisphericity. A couple of times I had them test the idea that folks scoring as preferring a right hemisphericity style on a questionnaire based on Torrence's Your Style of Learning and Thinking, would evidence more reversals of the Necker Cube than their left hemisphericity counterparts. No dice. In fact, my recollection of the literature on this stuff was that published attempts had also failed to find hemisphericity or even laterality differences (see, for example, Beer, 1988 and Kinsbourne, 1967). References Beer, J. (1988). Hemispheric dominance inferred from Your Style of Learning and Thinking and Thinking on reports of Necker cube reversals and maze learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 66, 887-890. Kinsbourne, M. (1967). Cerebral missile wounds, perspective and movement reversals. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 144(2), 139-144. Miguel --- To make changes to your subscription contact: Bill Southerly ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
