Hi Ekr, Sure--
My basic opinion aside: my comment here is that speculating that large swaths of people are under coercion (in any topic of discussion) is a very powerful claim. On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 5:43 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 2:40 PM Daniel Apon <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Nico, >> >> The past two posts seem to cast others' actions or opinions under a >> certain context/framing that they would likely object to. >> E.g. speculating "Perhas[sic] they think" and "that want to XYZ may do so >> under coercion" >> >> I don't think it's helpful to the discussion to pigeonhole others' >> opinions (especially opinions of a large variety of people representing >> many different working groups and many different interests) in such an >> undermining manner. >> >> For example, my basic opinion is that (i) hybrid should be standardized >> (it is!) and (ii) pure-mlkem should be standardized as well (the topic of >> discussion), >> > > This is not in fact the topic of discussion. This document is up for > Informational, not Proposed Standard, and I haven't heard any serious > proposals to change that. > > -Ekr > >
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
