On Mon, Apr 6, 2026 at 2:40 PM Daniel Apon <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Nico, > > The past two posts seem to cast others' actions or opinions under a > certain context/framing that they would likely object to. > E.g. speculating "Perhas[sic] they think" and "that want to XYZ may do so > under coercion" > > I don't think it's helpful to the discussion to pigeonhole others' > opinions (especially opinions of a large variety of people representing > many different working groups and many different interests) in such an > undermining manner. > > For example, my basic opinion is that (i) hybrid should be standardized > (it is!) and (ii) pure-mlkem should be standardized as well (the topic of > discussion), > This is not in fact the topic of discussion. This document is up for Informational, not Proposed Standard, and I haven't heard any serious proposals to change that. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
