Hi Rob,

On 23.04.26 02:07, Rob Sayre wrote:
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 4:34 PM Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:


    As I said in the meeting, I think there are reasonable arguments to be
    made about how the FATT ought to engage with the WG, and ceteris
    paribus, I think it's better for things to be open.


I agree with Ekr here,

Mind clarifying which part you agree with:

1. "there are reasonable arguments to be made about how the FATT ought
   to engage with the WG"
2. "it's better for things to be open"

2 is fine and I think we are all in agreement.

If 1, could you please clarify whether you are claiming that the arguments I have made in the thread are /not/ reasonable? If so, please clarify which of my arguments are lacking? Thank you.

Best regards,

-Usama


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to