On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 3:23 AM Muhammad Usama Sardar < [email protected]> wrote:
> the primary concern was to preserve anonymity of FATT, even though the set > is itself very small. > Just to be clear, the membership is public: https://github.com/tlswg/tls-fatt/blob/main/fatt-membership.md That the membership is public for a WG-sanctioned one is in the IESG statement: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/statement-iesg-on-design-teams-20011221/ > My idea of *hybrid* design team is just a middle ground that hopefully > works for everyone. > Like I said, I can live with what you have, but I wish the intra-FATT stuff was public and read-only, like IESG minutes. thanks, Rob
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
