On 27.04.26 18:59, Rob Sayre wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 3:23 AM Muhammad Usama Sardar
<[email protected]> wrote:
the primary concern was to preserve anonymity of FATT, even though
the set is itself very small.
Just to be clear, the membership is public:
https://github.com/tlswg/tls-fatt/blob/main/fatt-membership.md
Correct. That's what I called as the 'very small' anonymity set. My point was that: within this anonymity set, they were not comfortable revealing the identity of the individual comments, hence 'anonymous' or 'unnamed' FATT member in [0]. But that's fine because all of them are respectable field experts.
My idea of /hybrid/ design team is just a middle ground that
hopefully works for everyone.
Like I said, I can live with what you have, but I wish the intra-FATT
stuff was public and read-only, like IESG minutes.
Best regards, -Usama[0] https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/125/materials/slides-125-tls-sessa-fatt-report-on-eku-00.pdf#page=11
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
