Seems like some overlap there (all about an hour ago).

https://github.com/bwesterb/draft-westerbaan-tls-keyshare-recommendations/pull/5/changes

But still: it should be "Updated Recommendations for TLS Key Shares" (not
"For")

thanks,
Rob


On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 3:14 PM Rob Sayre <[email protected]> wrote:

> It's a short document. Just do the copy editing.
>
>
>
>                Updated recommendations for TLS keyshares
>             draft-westerbaan-tls-keyshare-recommendations-02
> Abstract
>
>    This document recommends X25519MLKEM768 for use in TLS by updating
>    its entry in the TLS Supported Groups registry (previously EC Named
>    Curve Registry) to Recommended in the light of the future arrival of
>    cryptographically relevant quantum computers.
>
>    [[ NOTE I use key share in the title and here as it's more accurate
>    than "group" and perhaps more well known in the context TLS than key
>    agreement or key exchange. ]]
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 3:05 PM Muhammad Usama Sardar <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 28.04.26 23:26, Rob Sayre wrote:
>>
>> Well, I think you should go through and fix "keyshare" vs "key share" vs
>> "keyshares" vs "key shares".
>>
>> Not a technical concern, but this document is "all over the shop" on this
>> point, as they say. :)
>>
>> I find that a tiny bit exaggerated. ISTM the only problem was in the
>> title which is fixed [0].
>>
>>    - I don't find "keyshare" anywhere except in draft *name* (not the
>>    title), which cannot have spaces.
>>    - All instances of "key share" and "key shares" look fine to me
>>    (singular vs plural).
>>
>> If you see something wrong, please submit a PR. Thank you.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> -Usama
>>
>> [0]
>> https://github.com/bwesterb/draft-westerbaan-tls-keyshare-recommendations/pull/5
>>
>
_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to