On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 3:46 PM Salz, Rich <[email protected]> wrote:
> This draft does two things: makes PQ/T key exchanges RECOMMENDED Y (one > proposed change adds all three to the approved list) It also does another > thing, making traditional key exchange RECOMMENDED N, im another proposed > change. > I believe that the current version only changes the status of X25519MLKEM768 to Y. Did I misunderstand? https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-westerbaan-tls-keyshare-recommendations-02.html#name-iana-considerations So are you suggesting the current draft, or the draft with one or both of > the PR’s merged be integrated into the RFC-to-be? > The current draft, but I could live with making the other hybrid algorithms Y. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ TLS mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
