If the change to the other draft is possible, I also prefer that outcome.

On Wed, Apr 29, 2026, at 06:54, Eric Rescorla wrote:
> I am in favor of the substantive change proposed by this draft.
>
> However, I do not think that we should *adopt* this draft. 
> draft-ietf-tls-edhe-mlkem-04 is currently in the RFC Editor Queue and 
> we should simply change the IANA Considerations section of this draft 
> prior to publication. I recognize this requires a new WGLC and a new 
> IETF LC, but we can just do that now. Publishing a new RFC that does 
> nothing other than change the IANA Considerations section in a document 
> which has not yet been published is just unnecessary process.
>
> -Ekr
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2026 at 1:47 PM Joseph Salowey <[email protected]> wrote:
>> This is a working group adoption call for 
>> draft-westerbaan-tls-keyshare-recommendations-02 that we noted in [1]. The 
>> purpose of this draft is solely to mark X25519MLKEM768 as recommended "Y" in 
>> the registry. This draft represents what the authors think is an acceptable 
>> compromise combining two drafts: 
>> draft-westerbaan-tls-keyshare-recommendations-00 and 
>> draft-usama-tls-ecdhe-mlkem-update-00.  The notable differences in the 
>> latest draft are:
>> 
>> 1. The draft does not deprecate the traditional ECDHE groups
>> 2. The draft only marks X25519MLKEM768 as "Y" and the other hybrid ECDHE 
>> groups remain "N"
>> 
>> These differences can be addressed in future documents if necessary
>> 
>> Please respond to this thread if you approve of adopting this draft as a 
>> working group item. If you do not approve of adopting this work, please 
>> explain why. This call will close on May 11, 2026.
>> 
>> The chairs are not sending this draft to the FATT for review because it only 
>> updates an IANA registry for an algorithm defined in another draft. 
>> 
>> REMINDER 1: If you have not done so recently, review the TLS WG's Mail List 
>> Procedures; see [2].
>> 
>> REMINDER 2: As noted in [1], we plan to WGLC this draft soon after 
>> successful adoption on a working group document incorporating any changes 
>> identified in the adoption process.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Joe, Deirdre, Sean
>> 
>> [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ckzUlvxUpa38lzHEVKwBlXwQ8x0/
>> [2] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tls/ucdImHExlbOf4Q3BCG81gjzi2xE/
>> _______________________________________________
>> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> _______________________________________________
> TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

_______________________________________________
TLS mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to