Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC...

[Pier P. Fumagalli]

jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Changing to DOXYGEN sounds bad for me because:
> - It is written C it have to will to port to the platfroms we want to support.
>   (And that work does not looks easy).

Agreed on this one..

> - Why changing a tool that works fine?

Because it _DOESN'T_ work fine... If you use it against APR, it screws up
all the generated documentation (try it!), and also parts of WebApp are
wrong...

> - Why using a different documentation tool in each ASF project?

Yes, so WHY USING SCANDOC... If you're following APR, you have noticed that
they moved from SCANDOC to DOXYGEN...

> I would more happy using a JAVA written tool than a C/C++ one.

Me too... But it doesn't seem to exist... (Damnit!)

    Pier