jean-frederic clere at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I am sorry... I should have complained before in APR... Now it is a bit too > late. > > We really should use a common tool in ASF when possible, if the tool is > DOXYGEN > we will have to use DOXYGEN. Seeing it a little bit in deep, DOXYGEN is not a good thing... It just works better than ScanDOC (the parsing engine is WAY better), but it's a lame-ass program... The only thing I'd need to do it in Java would be a C source parser, and then I could stick it into StyleBook/2, but so far, I haven't been able to figure out how JavaCC works... Pier
- [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC... kevin seguin
- RE: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC... GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC..... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCAND... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of S... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN ins... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN... jean-frederic clere
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC..... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC... GOMEZ Henri
- RE: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC... GOMEZ Henri
- Re: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC..... Pier P. Fumagalli
- RE: [JTC] Use of DOXYGEN instead of SCANDOC... GOMEZ Henri