"Pier P. Fumagalli" wrote:
>
> Pier P. Fumagalli at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >> - Why using a different documentation tool in each ASF project?
> >
> > Yes, so WHY USING SCANDOC... If you're following APR, you have noticed that
> > they moved from SCANDOC to DOXYGEN...
>
> BTW, reference....
>
> Pier
>
> Ben Laurie at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >>
> >> On Sat, Jun 09, 2001 at 06:32:18PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> >>> Note that we're using doxygen now, which:
> >>>
> >>> a) Doesn't understand @deffunc
> >>>
> >>> b) Doesn't need it
> >>
> >> So, should we remove all of these lines if they just add unnecessary
> >> work? -- justin
> >
> > Well, yeah, but you also need to add the stuff that doxygen needs (at
> > least, ideally).
> [...]
I am sorry... I should have complained before in APR... Now it is a bit too
late.
We really should use a common tool in ASF when possible, if the tool is DOXYGEN
we will have to use DOXYGEN.
