On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Jan Luehe wrote:
> the current approach should be able to handle a NESTED 'foo' in 2
> different tags, with different declared types, as long as one tag
> isn't nested inside the other. The current approach will generate code
> like this:
>
> {
> Integer foo;
> }
>
> {
> String foo;
> }
>
> However, the current approach will not work if one such tag is nested
> inside the other. Because of the nesting, 'foo' may be declared only
> by the encapsulating tag, and would have to be declared as of type
> Object to accommodate the different types, but this could break
> scripting code expecting the more specific type.
Of course it won't work for nesting. But if not nested - I think
it should work.
Looking at the generated code, I don't see any generated { },
that's why I was worried. I'll try this with the new patch,
maybe it's fixed now.
Costin
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
