Remy Maucherat wrote: > In this email, I forgot to speak about other commons (and others) > dependencies. Thanks for all the volunteering, BTW, it really helps > (damn day job ...) :)
+1 :-) > JMX: I think we should try to ship with JMX 1.2 + a JSR 160 > implementation if possible. I really hope MX4J will be able to provide > that. I think we must ship with JMX1.2 - AFAIK MX4J is close, but it may be better to use JMX-RI for this one. If I remember the terms on the licence are different from the previous one - but someone should confirm if we can redistribute it. > Tyrex: This project seems dead (unfortunately) :-( We could replace it > with some other TM, or (I like that one better) not provide an object > factory implementation for UserTransaction by default, and let third > parties provide it. That model seems to work great for J2EE providers > (JOTM, OpenEJB, etc). +1 on no TM. If someone needs a TM - he can choose whatever fits. This will also reduce the size of tomcat :-) > Struts: We need 1.1 ! (I think the rest of the world does also :-D) > > Watchdog: (to the Sun folks) Where is Watchdog 5 (or whatever it's called) > ? > > Remy Costin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
