The following is a cut'n paste from "tomcat/doc/uguide/tomcat_ug.html".
If you have tomcat installed, look for this doc and provide this text to your
sys admin.
Setting Tomcat to Cooperate with the Apache Web Server
Tomcat is not as fast as Apache when it comes to static pages. Tomcat is not
as configurable as Apache. Tomcat is not as robust as Apache.
On Monday 30 July 2001 05:59 pm, you wrote:
> What? using Apache with Tomcat will increase the performance for static
> pages? Well, my admin told me the opposite, she said the browser
> "hesitated" for a fraction of a second and then the static pages got load
> up when using Apache + Tomcat. So she wanted to use Tomcat standalone
> instead. So how come there is an increase in performance? Please help me to
> convice my admin to use both Apache and Tomcat. Thanks much in advance.
>
> T.
>
> Srinivas Reddy wrote:
> > Also there is an increase in performance for static files like .html and
> > static images.
> >
> > -srini
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tim O'Neil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 2:27 PM
> > Subject: Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache
> >
> > > At 02:04 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote:
> > > >Are there any advantages running Tomcat with Apache
> > > >versus running Tomcat standalone and listening on port
> > > >80. I am running only *.jsp files on my webserver.
> > >
> > > Added security if you use Apache.
--
Richard Draucker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Protected-Data.Com www.protected-data.com
Remote Data Support For Web Developers
