At 05:19 PM 7/30/2001, you wrote: >Of course, there are many non-performance-related reasons you might be >required to use Apache in conjunction with Tomcat (if you need the other >functionality that it provides). But, if you don't, you owe it to >yourself to see if Tomcat stand-alone runs fast enough before undertaking >the extra pain it takes to configure them to run together. I don't consider it that painful. It's hardly a pain at all. It involves adding an include to apache's httpd.conf. You still have to do all the configuration stuff in tomcat anyway. But I've heard from more than one that Tomcat is faster. So there's that. But if security is an issue for you I have a hard time believing that Tomcat is as secure as Apache.
- Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Chad Wray
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Tim O'Neil
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Srinivas Reddy
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Tsinwah Lee
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Ap... Richard Draucker
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat ... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tom... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs... Dmitri Colebatch
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tom... Tim O'Neil
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs... Craig R. McClanahan
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs... Pier P. Fumagalli
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Dan Bachelder
- Re: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Ashish Bajpai
- RE: Tomcat standalone vs Tomcat w/ Apache Curtis Dougherty