Im sorry to have confused you. The error message i
mentioned is this:
[Thu Jan 23 14:34:27 2003] [warn] Init: Session Cache
is not configured [hint: \SSLSessionCache]
Is this is to do with SSL?- I am not usind SSL. 
The error message that I get on my browser is Filenot
found 404.

Thank you



--- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Sorry, I'm pretty confused right now.  I thought you
> said the tomcat
> examples were working, but the other applications
> that you added weren't.
> 
> What is the exact error message that you get when
> you try to access
> http://your.domain.name/examples using your existing
> configuration?  I
> realize the examples are not your application, but
> if you can get the
> examples to work, that proves that the configuration
> is ready for
> customization.  
> 
> I don't know what error message you mean.  Do you
> mean the one about the SSL
> message?  Are you using SSL?  It doesn't look like
> it to me, but maybe I am
> wrong.
> 
> Typically, for every "/someApp" in
> http://some.server.com/someApp, you have
> a Context.  In a default installation, there is a
> Context for /examples,
> /admin, and /manager.  If all 3 of those work, you
> have a solid foundation
> for customization and tweaking.  If those three do
> not work, then making
> custom changes will just make things worse.  Even
> the ROOT is a Context.
> Tomcat has to have an entry point in order to find
> everything else it needs
> to do its job.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:16 PM
> > To: Tomcat Users List
> > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 Integration
> on Linux 7.1
> > 
> > 
> > Do you have to include Context in server.xml? Let
> me
> > get this straight first - Is this required when
> tomcat
> > runs as a standalone? If so, I have never included
> > anything in server.xml. Both for tomcat on win and
> > linux. And they have been working fine for me.
> Also I
> > have integrated apache and tomcat on windows
> without
> > making any Context additions to server.xml.
> > 
> > Another thing is, even examples dont work for me,
> and
> > the context for that is already in the xml file.
> And
> > there is the error in my apache's log file to be
> > explained. IT doesnt seem to point to a context
> > problem does it?
> > 
> > Thank you.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > 
> > > Where are the Contexts in server.xml for all of
> your
> > > applications??
> > > 
> > > For each "/someDir" in a URL you need a Context.
> > > 
> > > John
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:56 PM
> > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18
> Integration
> > > on Linux 7.1
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Oh ok. I thouht inline would be easier. I have
> > > > attached the files this time.
> > > > Thank you.
> > > > 
> > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 2.0.44 is module compatible with 2.0.43. 
> > > Everything
> > > > > looks OK, but it would
> > > > > probably be easier if you posted the files:
> > > > > server.xml, mod_jk.conf,
> > > > > workers.properties.  It's hard to diagnose
> when
> > > > > things are copied inline, at
> > > > > least for me.
> > > > > 
> > > > > John
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:38 PM
> > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18
> > > Integration
> > > > > on Linux 7.1
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Yes I did. Does apache2.0.44 work with
> > > > > > mod_jk2.0.43.so? Has anybody done this
> before?
> > > Or
> > > > > > maybe I should just stick to ur suggestion
> and
> > > get
> > > > > > apache2.0.43 on my system?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > --
> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> > > > >
> > >
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > >
> __________________________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign
> up
> > > now.
> > > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> > >
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up
> now.
> > http://mailplus.yahoo.com
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:  
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 


__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to