If you can't get responses when checking from a remote machine, you have a name resolution/DNS problem that is preventing thedomainname from resolving to a number.
John -----Original Message----- From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:42 PM To: Tomcat Users List Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 Integration on Linux 7.1 John: I just checked this out. The connection is working if I access the server from the same machine. Till now, I was checking this from a remote machine. But listen to this - maybe it would help. It works for: http://localhost - I see the default Apache page. But http://localhost:8080/ does not work. When I give http://thedomainname:8080/ it works. and http://thedomainname/examples works and so do all my other applications. All this happens in the same machine. It does not work from remote machines. Would this be a problem with my servername in http.conf and host in server.xml? I have checked them and they point to the same name. This is so frustrating :( --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sorry, I'm stumped. Your config files look OK to > me. I'm assuming that > wherever you have "thedomainname" in your files, > that you have an actual > name that can be resolved to an IP address, right? > "thedomainname" is just > a placeholder you're using when you post the files > to the net for us to see? > > > John > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:08 PM > > To: Tomcat Users List > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 Integration > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > Im sorry to have confused you. The error message i mentioned is > > this: [Thu Jan 23 14:34:27 2003] [warn] Init: Session > Cache > > is not configured [hint: \SSLSessionCache] > > Is this is to do with SSL?- I am not usind SSL. > > The error message that I get on my browser is > Filenot > > found 404. > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, I'm pretty confused right now. I thought > you > > > said the tomcat > > > examples were working, but the other > applications > > > that you added weren't. > > > > > > What is the exact error message that you get > when > > > you try to access > > > http://your.domain.name/examples using your > existing > > > configuration? I > > > realize the examples are not your application, > but > > > if you can get the > > > examples to work, that proves that the > configuration > > > is ready for > > > customization. > > > > > > I don't know what error message you mean. Do > you > > > mean the one about the SSL > > > message? Are you using SSL? It doesn't look > like > > > it to me, but maybe I am > > > wrong. > > > > > > Typically, for every "/someApp" in http://some.server.com/someApp, > > > you have a Context. In a default installation, there is > a > > > Context for /examples, > > > /admin, and /manager. If all 3 of those work, > you > > > have a solid foundation > > > for customization and tweaking. If those three > do > > > not work, then making > > > custom changes will just make things worse. > Even > > > the ROOT is a Context. > > > Tomcat has to have an entry point in order to > find > > > everything else it needs > > > to do its job. > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:16 PM > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 > Integration > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have to include Context in server.xml? > Let > > > me > > > > get this straight first - Is this required > when > > > tomcat > > > > runs as a standalone? If so, I have never > included > > > > anything in server.xml. Both for tomcat on win > and > > > > linux. And they have been working fine for me. > > > Also I > > > > have integrated apache and tomcat on windows > > > without > > > > making any Context additions to server.xml. > > > > > > > > Another thing is, even examples dont work for > me, > > > and > > > > the context for that is already in the xml > file. > > > And > > > > there is the error in my apache's log file to > be > > > > explained. IT doesnt seem to point to a > context > > > > problem does it? > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Where are the Contexts in server.xml for all > of > > > your > > > > > applications?? > > > > > > > > > > For each "/someDir" in a URL you need a > Context. > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:56 PM > > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 > > > Integration > > > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh ok. I thouht inline would be easier. I > have > > > > > > attached the files this time. > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.0.44 is module compatible with 2.0.43. > > > > > > Everything > > > > > > > looks OK, but it would > > > > > > > probably be easier if you posted the > files: > > > > > > > server.xml, mod_jk.conf, > > > > > > > workers.properties. It's hard to > diagnose > > > when > > > > > > > things are copied inline, at > > > > > > > least for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: vim m > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:38 > PM > > > > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 > > > > > Integration > > > > > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes I did. Does apache2.0.44 work with mod_jk2.0.43.so? > > > > > > > > Has anybody done this > > > before? > > > > > Or > > > > > > > > maybe I should just stick to ur > suggestion > > > and > > > > > get > > > > > > > > apache2.0.43 on my system? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === message truncated === __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 --- Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.443 / Virus Database: 248 - Release Date: 1/10/2003 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
