I don't necessarily think this is a DNS problem. Typically you get a 404 error or 500 error when this occurs, which implies that the request is getting to the server, it's just not mapping the localhost context.
Ed On Fri, 2003-01-24 at 05:03, Tomislav Miladinovic wrote: > I can't figure out who has posted this question but it seems to me that > configuration of the TCP/IP stack is not proper. If DNS functionality is not > enabled then TCP/IP driver can't read 'hosts' file and resolve localhost > name. So go to Settings>Networks>TCP/IP and enable DNS. > > Tomislav > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "vim m" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Tomcat Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 1:42 PM > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 Integration on Linux 7.1 > > > > John: I just checked this out. The connection is > > working if I access the server from the same machine. > > Till now, I was checking this from a remote machine. > > But listen to this - maybe it would help. > > It works for: > > http://localhost - I see the default Apache page. > > But http://localhost:8080/ does not work. > > > > When I give > > http://thedomainname:8080/ it works. > > and http://thedomainname/examples works and so do all > > my other applications. > > All this happens in the same machine. It does not work > > from remote machines. > > > > Would this be a problem with my servername in > > http.conf and host in server.xml? I have checked them > > and they point to the same name. > > This is so frustrating :( > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Sorry, I'm stumped. Your config files look OK to > > > me. I'm assuming that > > > wherever you have "thedomainname" in your files, > > > that you have an actual > > > name that can be resolved to an IP address, right? > > > "thedomainname" is just > > > a placeholder you're using when you post the files > > > to the net for us to see? > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 4:08 PM > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 Integration > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > Im sorry to have confused you. The error message i > > > > mentioned is this: > > > > [Thu Jan 23 14:34:27 2003] [warn] Init: Session > > > Cache > > > > is not configured [hint: \SSLSessionCache] > > > > Is this is to do with SSL?- I am not usind SSL. > > > > The error message that I get on my browser is > > > Filenot > > > > found 404. > > > > > > > > Thank you > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, I'm pretty confused right now. I thought > > > you > > > > > said the tomcat > > > > > examples were working, but the other > > > applications > > > > > that you added weren't. > > > > > > > > > > What is the exact error message that you get > > > when > > > > > you try to access > > > > > http://your.domain.name/examples using your > > > existing > > > > > configuration? I > > > > > realize the examples are not your application, > > > but > > > > > if you can get the > > > > > examples to work, that proves that the > > > configuration > > > > > is ready for > > > > > customization. > > > > > > > > > > I don't know what error message you mean. Do > > > you > > > > > mean the one about the SSL > > > > > message? Are you using SSL? It doesn't look > > > like > > > > > it to me, but maybe I am > > > > > wrong. > > > > > > > > > > Typically, for every "/someApp" in > > > > > http://some.server.com/someApp, you have > > > > > a Context. In a default installation, there is > > > a > > > > > Context for /examples, > > > > > /admin, and /manager. If all 3 of those work, > > > you > > > > > have a solid foundation > > > > > for customization and tweaking. If those three > > > do > > > > > not work, then making > > > > > custom changes will just make things worse. > > > Even > > > > > the ROOT is a Context. > > > > > Tomcat has to have an entry point in order to > > > find > > > > > everything else it needs > > > > > to do its job. > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 3:16 PM > > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 > > > Integration > > > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you have to include Context in server.xml? > > > Let > > > > > me > > > > > > get this straight first - Is this required > > > when > > > > > tomcat > > > > > > runs as a standalone? If so, I have never > > > included > > > > > > anything in server.xml. Both for tomcat on win > > > and > > > > > > linux. And they have been working fine for me. > > > > > Also I > > > > > > have integrated apache and tomcat on windows > > > > > without > > > > > > making any Context additions to server.xml. > > > > > > > > > > > > Another thing is, even examples dont work for > > > me, > > > > > and > > > > > > the context for that is already in the xml > > > file. > > > > > And > > > > > > there is the error in my apache's log file to > > > be > > > > > > explained. IT doesnt seem to point to a > > > context > > > > > > problem does it? > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Where are the Contexts in server.xml for all > > > of > > > > > your > > > > > > > applications?? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For each "/someDir" in a URL you need a > > > Context. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > From: vim m [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:56 PM > > > > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 > > > > > Integration > > > > > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Oh ok. I thouht inline would be easier. I > > > have > > > > > > > > attached the files this time. > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --- "Turner, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 2.0.44 is module compatible with 2.0.43. > > > > > > > > > > Everything > > > > > > > > > looks OK, but it would > > > > > > > > > probably be easier if you posted the > > > files: > > > > > > > > > server.xml, mod_jk.conf, > > > > > > > > > workers.properties. It's hard to > > > diagnose > > > > > when > > > > > > > > > things are copied inline, at > > > > > > > > > least for me. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > > > > From: vim m > > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 2:38 > > > PM > > > > > > > > > > To: Tomcat Users List > > > > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Apache2.0.40 Tomcat4.1.18 > > > > > > > Integration > > > > > > > > > on Linux 7.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes I did. Does apache2.0.44 work with > > > > > > > > > > mod_jk2.0.43.so? Has anybody done this > > > > > before? > > > > > > > Or > > > > > > > > > > maybe I should just stick to ur > > > suggestion > > > > > and > > > > > > > get > > > > > > > > > > apache2.0.43 on my system? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > === message truncated === > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do you Yahoo!? > > Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. > > http://mailplus.yahoo.com > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
