> > The real question is: with Freenet, I2P, Gnunet, CJDNS,
> > Phantom, Tor, etc... afaik all seemingly 'pretty good' and not
> > broken... *why* are their adoption shares ranked however
> > they are?
>
> I think it's because they're all either abandoned, noticeably
> insecure, or in their infancy. Tor is the only one with an active
> developer community, a strong basis in research, and a proven track
> record of security.
>
> Sometimes questions just have simple answers.
So freenet is 'abandoned'? 'noticeably insecure'? or in 'its
infancy'?
I eagerly await some serious information here.
Plus your idea that tor works because allegedly there
are no NSA documents saying otherwise is a joke.
"Absence of Evidence is not Evidence of Absence"
--
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
