snarlydwarf;538619 Wrote: > Not really. > > And you left out the Radio, which also uses much of the same code. > > 'SqueezeOS' is maturing. > > (Of course, it helps that the operating model of the Radio and Touch > are also simpler: there isn't a headless device they need to talk to... > there is no doubt some confusion when setting up SBR's whether you're > talking to the SBC or the SBR... The Touch and Radio don't have that > layer of confusion to them.)
I left the radio out only because I don't own one and can't comment on it based on first hand use; I only know what's been said about it here. What you say makes sense. Your comment on "SqueezeOS is maturing" is what I was driving at: Duet maturing = SqueezeOS maturing. Touch uses SqueezeOS, therefor Touch benefits from Duet maturity. Good, I'm not nuts :-). Seeing comments like "the duet has nothing to do with the Touch" were making me wonder if I understood the architecture correctly. -- maggior Rich --------- Setup: 2 SB3s, 4 Booms, 1 Duet, 1 Receiver, 1 Touch. SuSE 11.0 Server running SqueezeBoxServer 7.5.0, MusicIP, and SqueezeSlave. Current library stats: 33,060 songs, 2,656 albums, 484 artists. http://www.last.fm/user/maggior ------------------------------------------------------------------------ maggior's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=9080 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=77701 _______________________________________________ Touch mailing list Touch@lists.slimdevices.com http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch
