gw43 wrote: 
> I'll take your points in order.
> 
> I'm not having a snipe at Logitech - when the Touch worked it was great.
> What I came home from work and wanted to listen to something to
> something from my collection and I turned it on, it was great. What
> wasn't great was the (sadly frequent) times when I had to spend 20-30
> minutes fannying* about with the software to get it working. What wasn't
> great was on my wife's days off her calling me at work to say she
> couldn't get internet radio working. 
> 
> Sophisticated devices - in my experience, the more sophisticated a
> device, the easier/better the user experience. I have had a couple of
> decades working in manufacturing, some of it in hi-tech. Make it work,
> make it work well, then make it cheap! Slim Devices, and then Logitech
> had barely got beyond the first stage.
> 
> There is a quote on one of the Sonos forums (fora?!) that states
> something along the lines of "music does not exist to test your hifi"  
> 
> 
> I do not need to have devices around the house to make me appear
> "technologically savvy". I've got beyond that. I want thing to, just,
> work. Is that too much to ask.
> 
> When I have people round for dinner, and they suggest something that is
> available on Spotify, it would be quite nice to be able to play the
> tracks of their choice without any bother. Sonos lets me do this. I do
> not need to try and impress upon them my "technology savvy" chops by
> having to dick about with the bloody Squeezebox Touch every third track
> 'cos it's dropped the connection. If that's being "technology savvy",
> then leave me out, I'd rather be a card-carrying member of the real
> world music loving community that just WANTS STUFF TO WORK. First time,
> every time.
> 
> As you may have gathered, *I at first found your post amusing, then,
> after the benefit of a few beers, quite insulting*.
> 
> I'm glad to be moving away from a community that, on the basis of your
> post, seems to promote complexity over simplicity, makes a virtue of
> things being "difficult", and mocks well thought out solutions to
> problems.
> 
> 
> * If you're from the USA, then "fanny" has a different meaning to us in
> the UK. To us in the UK, a "fanny", is a, well, how do I say it? It's a
> lady's front bottom. If you've never seen one, ask a grown up.

Just to clear something up, the bold quoted part of your post is exactly
how I intended my post to come across.

"*Having a go*" (which is how I perceived your OP) on *-this-* forum is
a waste of time and effort - it is a hangover from the days of Slim
Devices that Logitech still indulges.
Your post should have been posted in the *Logitech* forum, where it
would have been ignored.
Logitech generally disregard what happens over here - Logitech have
abandoned Squeezebox because it is high maintenance, and they are not
set up to support it, which -is- a real shame.

I was none too pleased to see you having a dig at a community that is
*not* responsible for causing your woes, and that, as I have already
stated, is how I perceived your post.

Enjoy your Sonos.
If it does what you want, then that's great.
My Squeezebox Touch plays 24/192 files with no issue (thanks Triode),
and that's with a server that cannot resample on the fly, which is also
great.
Spotify is not in my list of requirements, although it's nice if it
works.



Chris :)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stratmangler's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=20387
View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=100758

_______________________________________________
Touch mailing list
Touch@lists.slimdevices.com
http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/touch

Reply via email to