On Wo, 2008-07-02 at 23:18 +0200, Miklos Vajna wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 02:36:34AM +0200, Lars Kruse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote:
... > > C) > > - applying Miklos patches to the current git support > > - ignoring incompatibility with git<=1.5.2 > > I think the situation where compabitility with git<=1.5.2 makes sense is > Debian stable. It has Pootle 0.10.1. It just does not have Git support. > If a sysadmin decides to install newer a never (it was called > unofficial) version of Pootle, then I think it is not that hard to > install a newer version of Git as well. > > I think if we want to support Debian stable, then we have to support > 1.4.4.4, since that's the official version Debian comes with. There are > major changes between 1.4.x and 1.5.x, and - to be honest - I'm not too > motivated to write code for <1.5.x. > > So I would vote for C). > > Just my two cents. I think these are very valid comments. This whole conversation is about a bug anyway, and git is (as you mention) previously unsupported. If the code to support older git versions is available, we obviously use it, but I'm not too concerned about halting anything just to support all versions. Friedel ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: SourceForge.net Community Choice Awards: VOTE NOW! Studies have shown that voting for your favorite open source project, along with a healthy diet, reduces your potential for chronic lameness and boredom. Vote Now at http://www.sourceforge.net/community/cca08 _______________________________________________ Translate-pootle mailing list Translate-pootle@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/translate-pootle
