|
Sorry Izzy, that warn't me. I couldn't tell a virus from
a trapizoid.
I don't meven know where Duke and Harvard are located!
(Don't bother to tell me, I wouldn't remember) All I know about blood
is that it gets all over you when you butcher a hog. No need for an
apology. Even nurses make mizteaks.
Terry
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 5:40
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Fw: Science and
pork
Gosh,
Terry, thanks for clearing that all up for me, in a way that my nurses
training (and my husband’s medical training at Duke and Harvard)never did.
(NOT!) I guess we just don’t know as much about the composition of blood as
you do. Or was it physics? Or was it rocket science???
Izzy
-----Original
Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of little children of Jesus
Christ
Sent:
Thursday, January 16,
2003 1:03
AM
To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Fw: Science and
pork
Greetings
Izzy in the Matchless Name of YahShua [that's the
name Jesus was called
by
His mom, dad, brothers, sisters, disciples and
others who loved Him] :) !!
Izzy
declared in her own words ...
> I have serious
problems understanding
That is
immediately evident from my cursory reading of your reaction, er, uh,
response.
>
I am unfamiliar with
any common state that all cancer patients have in their
blood.
Do you mean
to infer that if you don't know it then it must not be
so?
>
Pleomorphism means “many shapes”. (ie: of cells)
>
Bacteria and viruses are two different entities (like apples and oranges). As
far as I know, a bacteria is never in “virus form”.
In response
to your two statements, 'no' and 'no'.
As to your
first statement, apples can never be oranges, and oranges can never be
apples. However, some (?all?) bacteria can become viruses, and some
(?all?) viruses can become bacteria i.e. one can become another "entity" ...
and so much more!
As to your
second statement, well, you have much to learn. Sorry to break the news
to you, though, that this does not make you special. It lumps you in
with most of the zombies that accept the drivel that they are told without
examination. Hosea 4:6
>
Again, what “form” or “picture” is he referring to? The shape of the blood
cells? The Ph of the plasma? The chemical composition?
What???
All of the
above and none of the above. The 'What' is even more foundational than
any and all of the above. It is a matter of
physics.
Now, Izzy,
before you go popping off again in disagreement with the truth of my
statements from your dearth of knowledge in these matters, try following after
the Scriptures with the words of another wise one ...
"Get wisdom,
get understanding: forget it not; neither decline from the words of my
mouth. Forsake her not, and she shall preserve thee: love her, and
she shall keep thee. Wisdom is the principal thing, therefore get
wisdom: and with all thy getting get understanding. Exalt her, and
she shall promote thee: she shall bring thee to honour, when thou dost
embrace her." Proverbs 4:5,6,7&8
When you
have a good working knowledge of Antoine Bechamp, Gunther Enderlein, Royal
Rife and Graeme Naessens then we can chat again on these matters. That
should take you some months (?years?).
Chris Barr,
an
underShepherd
little
children of Jesus
Christ
-----
Original Message -----
Subject: RE:
[TruthTalk] Fw: Science and pork
Marlin, While I
would like to believe the following article, I have serious problems
understanding how it could be scientific:
Part of his research with the
microscope revealed to him a specific state that the blood MUST be in for
cancer to develop.
In his notes he made notation of a
curiosity to him. He had discovered that pork caused the specific state for
cancer to develop and grow very rapidly. Whenever a test subject consumed
pork, their blood entered into that specific state of the blood that he had
discovered was necessary for cancer to develop. The blood would maintain this
state for up to nine hours after ingestion of pork.
What specific “state”
would that be? I am unfamiliar with any common state that all cancer patients
have in their blood.
In the 1940's Gruner argued in essays and books (An
Interpretation
of Cancer and the Study of Blood in Cancer) that
pleomorphism was a
phenomenon in other diseases.
Pleomorphism means
“many shapes”. (ie: of cells)
Gruner: "Viruses in the strict sense are mostly
discredited where cancer
is in question. However, the newer pleomorphists
stand in marked
contrast. The virus form, to them, is one phase in the life
history of
many, if not all bacteria. The bacteria forms do not produce
cancer, but
the virus forms does. The existence of virus forms of typhoid
bacillus,
colon bacillus, tubercle bacillus cannot seriously be disputed."
Bacteria and viruses
are two different entities (like apples and oranges). As far as I know, a
bacteria is never in “virus form”.
Gruner's specialty was blood. Rife had discovered that
pork caused the
cancer micro-organism to grow very rapidly. In fact,
Kendall's K
Meddium had a pork base. Gruner took this notion a step
further,
producing a startling and frightening fact for people who eat
pork.
Gruner wrote that the blood of a person who ate pork was the
SAME
(emphasis in the original) as a cancer patient for 8 or 9 hours
after
eating.
Gruner: "a meal which features pork will produce a
BLOOD PICTURE
INDISTINGUISHABLE FROM THAT OF CANCER,(emphasis in the
original), though
of course normality reappears after 8 to 9 hours"
Again, what “form” or
“picture” is he referring to? The shape of the blood cells? The Ph of the
plasma? The chemical composition? What???
Izzy
|
