From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] The Passion of the Christ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004 03:58:20 -0800 (PST)
Back in the old days, before computers to zip out copies. There were companies that printed forms. Sometimes forms would have a sort of part number. Would the form number printed on the bottom of the form, be legally binding? Would the form number be part of the terms of a contract?
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
The headings & chapter verses are not in the mss. They are not part of the text and not part of Gods word
You embarass yourself by claiming you thought the headings were scripture.
DAVEH: Forgive me for being naive, Kevin. As you are well aware, I'm not high on the TT IQ quotient protocol here.
that is just foolishness on your part. Perhaps you greatly desire to see something, anything, that will align with your preconcieved notions about errors in the Bible.
DAVEH: I hear seemingly contradictory statements and try to harmonize (as some TTers have used before) what I've heard to make sense.
Do you also think the form number on the bottom of your mortgage is part of the "CONTRACT"
DAVEH: Silly me.....somehow I thought when one signed one of those documents with all kinds of itty bitty disclaimers and numbers, including page numbers....it means that each of those points is important to the integrity of the entire document. What gave me that idea I suppose, is that one has to initial each and every page that contains one of those numbers. IF you are correct---that those page numbers aren't important to the integrity of the legal document---then I have learned something about law. IF you are wrong---that those page numbers aren't important to the integrity of the legal document---then I have learned something about you, Kevin.
LOL
Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
jt: Headers, chapter and verse divisions and all that are not and never were sacred text Daveh, so what's the problem?
DAVEH: The problem is some people may think it is part of the inerrant text. I did. I wonder if many of the KJVOnly folks do too? And, from what DavidM said......
There are some 1611 King James folks who think that is inerrant. Ithink Kevin is in this camp.
.......Perhaps Kevin believes such as well. I'd sure appreciate Kevin commenting on this. Which way do you believe, Kevin......Do you believe the headings are inerrant???
-- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]://www.langlitz.com~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~If you wish to receivethings I find interesting,I maintain Five email lists...JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,STUFF and MOTORCYCLE.
--------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Search - Find what you’re looking for faster.
_________________________________________________________________
Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee when you click here. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963
---------- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
