Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor

[Dave]

DAVEH:  LOL.........Yeah G.  But I noticed you tried to top him with your P's post to Judy.  I'm just surprised you overlooked prayerfully! +++++++++++ show some more love, M'am--back off a little (like this) so we can talk about it--privately, if you prefer--preferrably polite but perceptive protestant prodding & probing, positively, persistantly & powerfully G +++++++++++ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (hey DaveH--a new TT record for concatenating responses, eh? :)   On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:49:56 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Bill is [sanctified]," is presumed, and, at best, [though eternal], (is) now; therefore, the [sanctified-ness] is transitory [for now] which also squares with human experience; therefore, the present tense '[sanctified-]ness' is incomplete   On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:21:34 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: "Bill is [sad]," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the [sadness] is transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the present tense '[sad]ness' is incomplete   On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 07:52:51 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:   myth ("Bill is happy," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the happiness is transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the present tense 'happiness' is incomplete)   On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:02:32 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: || > Present tense does not necessarily indicate incomplete action.  > "Bill is happy," this does not mean that Bill is incomplete in his > happiness. ||       -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.