Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor

[David Miller]

If Bill's happiness were transitory, then you would be right, but it is possible that his happiness is found in eternal life, and if that were so, then it would not be transitory.  The point is that we do not know from the statement whether his happiness is complete or not.   Suppose I said, "Jesus is happy."  Would you make the same argument, that His happiness is incomplete?   Peace be with you. David Miller. ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2005 9:52 AM Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor   myth ("Bill is happy," is presumed, and, at best, (is) now; therefore, the happiness is transitory which also squares with human experience; therefore, the present tense 'happiness' is incomplete)   On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 09:02:32 -0500 "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: || > Present tense does not necessarily indicate incomplete action.  > "Bill is happy," this does not mean that Bill is incomplete in his > happiness. ||