Uh oh! JD has circumvented Wikipedia now and has
become smarter than their experts who say .....
"The only Bible which can legitimately be called a "revision" is the New King James Version,
since it is based on the same Greek texts—the Textus Receptus."
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 23:24:41 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it is not doubt that you see. It is distrust. For example -- you speak of the KJV as being 7 times purified or some such nonsense. And you give the reader a list of 7 bibles beginning with Wycliffe and ending with the KJV. You conveniently leave off the Bishop Bible -- you know , the one of which the KJV was a revision -- so you could come up with your mythological "7."The readers will need to refer to the post just previous to this one for that list.jd
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Deegan <openairmission@yahoo.com>
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 13:46:28 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] corrector/revisor
FAITH versus DOUBT that is what it is all about.Even if you ignore the scriptures & the meat of the post.It still speaks volumes.
You take no issue with the claim that you Doubt, for obvious reasons.No need to DO what God says since you can't find the original intent yet.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Besides nobody "DISGARDS" anything! You got to be kidding !!You and Judy are the most anti-theologicans I have ever seen. Male and female created He them.jd
judyt
He that says "I know Him" and doesn't keep His Commandments
is a liar (1 John 2:4)
