On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better than java serialization - more portable.
Yes agreed it is more "portable" and should be an option but with
JMS were are not invoking across providers and we are dealing with
Java on the receiving end. Also, I think we need to support
streaming. Maybe we could also do a AMQP binding too for
portability :-)
There's no guarantee that there is Java on the far end - JMS is just
the API at this end of the messaging infrastructure.
We really need to be able to serialize to any message form: XML, Java
serialization, various flavours of byte stream, user-defined
mechanisms. Hopefully by hooking this to the databinding framework we
can cover all these options.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]