Comment inline.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better than java serialization - more portable.
Yes agreed it is more "portable" and should be an option but with JMS
were are not invoking across providers and we are dealing with Java on
the receiving end. Also, I think we need to support streaming. Maybe we
could also do a AMQP binding too for portability :-)
There's no guarantee that there is Java on the far end - JMS is just the
API at this end of the messaging infrastructure.
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in JMS
across providers, not to mention programming languages.
We really need to be able to serialize to any message form: XML, Java
serialization, various flavours of byte stream, user-defined mechanisms.
Hopefully by hooking this to the databinding framework we can cover all
these options.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
