On Jan 24, 2008 5:36 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:

> ant elder wrote:
> > On Jan 23, 2008 5:53 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> >> If this is mainly about reducing the size of the download
> >> [snip]
> >>
> >> No
> >
> >
> > I'm puzzled by this. One of the two goals at the start of this thread
> was
> > "smaller packages".
>
> I'm puzzled that you find that puzzling :)
>
> I had spelled two goals:
> - smaller packages
> - easier for people to find what they need
>
> You asked "Is this *mainly* about reducing the size...", I replied "No",
> i.e. this is not *mainly* about smaller packages, it's about:
> (A) smaller packages
> (B) easier for people to find what they need
> and (B) is more important to me.
>
> If size really isn't an issue then whats the problem
> > with the distro including unneeded clutter - it can just be ignored?
> >
> > I would like to try have this reorg exercise get to a smaller download
> size
> > if possible - am I the only one that would like this?
> >
>
> Me too, one of my two goals was: (A) smaller packages.
>
> --
> Jean-Sebastien
>
>
Thanks for clarifying :-) I shall go and try to prioritize the goals over on
that other thread and ask others to do the same, that way maybe we'll all
understand better what everyone would like to achieve.

   ...ant

Reply via email to