Sorry for the late response.  I have been travelling and in OASIS
meetings, and I'm just catching up with the ML now.

See comments inline.

  Simon

Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:

Simon Nash wrote:
 >> Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:

- What distro Zips are we building and what do they contain? just the runtime? samples or not? dependencies or not? are we building specialized distros for different use cases?

[snip]

With a big topic like this, dividing it into separate threads makes it
easier for people to follow and participate in the discussions.  The
split you are suggesting looks good to me.

[snip]

I'd like to discuss the following: "What distro Zips are we building and what do they contain?"

I think we could improve our distro scheme to provide:
- smaller packages
- easier for people to find what they need

+1 to both of these.  It would also help modularity by eliminating
some undesired dependencies, and it would give people a better
understanding of the true size of Tuscany.

I was thinking about the following binary distro zips:

- tuscany-core.zip - The base that everybody needs.
  core assembly model and runtime
  Java APIs, Java components

I think it would make sense to have binding.ws in here.  If we are
including binding.sca (as auggested by Sebastien), this implies a
need for binding.ws to handle remote endpoints.

- tuscany-web.zip - For WS and Web developers
  WS binding, Web 2.0 bindings, Scripting components, Widget components

+1 (see comment above).

- tuscany-jee.zip - For JEE app integration
  EJB, RMI and JMS bindings, Spring components

+1

- tuscany-process.zip - For process development
  BPEL and XQuery components

+1

- tuscany-all.zip - all of the above

If this is exactly equal to the sum of all of the above, then we just
need a zipzip file that contains the other zips, with a script to
unzip them all into the same set of directories.

Note that I'm not trying to tackle release cycles and the potential for releasing the above zips independently in this discussion and I'm assuming that we release all of the above together.

+1 for taking this as a first step.

I'm also assuming that the relevant samples are included in each zip.

+1

  Simon

Thoughts?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to