I was among those who sneered at "Loonatics" from the concept drawings on, but I'll wait before trashing the latest "reinvention" - if that's what it truly is.
On May 27, 5:39 am, Wesley McGee <wesley.mc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Michael <mikethekn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Changes in attitudes and tone notwithstanding, the new character > > designs are not so different from the reworkings of the classic WB > > cartoon figures who taught the Tiny Toons. In fact, I'd say they > > appear a little closer to the Chuck Jones-era versions than those on > > "Tiny Toon Adventures." The complaints seem like knee-jerk stuff from > > people who need to rant about things. Where were they when the truly > > abominable "Loonatics" came along? Now THAT was worth skewering. > > http://www.cartoonbrew.com/old-brew/first-and-last-words-on-loonatics... > > To be fair, they were there back then, making the exact same complaints, > though like before it was based on just the design and synopsis. Ironically, > I agreed with them then on Loonatics though largely because they were using > an old and revered brand to sell something largely unrelated to it, though > not being confident enough to go all out. You can probably search my > comments on this, since I remember Loonatics was a big discussion here, back > when here was "TVBarn2". > > -- > Wesley McGeehttp://www.ambivi.comhttp://sterlingnorth.vox.com -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en
