The only way I see CBS's pricing making sense is for the people who already subscribe to the Big Brother live streams each summer (since they're included in the cost of the "all action" service).
On Thursday, October 16, 2014 10:46:01 AM UTC-4, Adam Bowie wrote: > > This is probably worthy of its own thread, but CBS is launching "CBS All > Action," including live streaming of most of its programming as well as an > extensive ad-free archive, all without the need for a cable subscription. > Live streaming is only in some markets initially, and NFL is currently > excluded. > > But I note that they'll be charging $5.99 a month for this service. Even > taking account of the volume of archive programming, that certainly makes > me think that HBO will be closer to $20 than $10 when it launches. > > > http://www.theverge.com/2014/10/16/6987543/cbs-all-access-streaming-service-no-cable-required-launches > > > Adam > > On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Adam Bowie <ad...@adambowie.co.uk > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> I think it's worth noting that "over-the-top" refers to any kind of >> service on demand streaming, and it can still refer to "walled garden" >> services that need accreditation via your cable operator. So HBOGo would >> already count as an "over-the-top" service. >> >> That said, it certainly still sounds like 3) in the list above. >> >> But I think the price would need to be closer to $20. If you look at the >> revenues that HBO makes through subscription, and their subscriber numbers, >> they're currently getting something like $11.80 per subscriber per month if >> my maths is correct (http://bowie.it/1yEH8cH). So that's the absolute >> minimum they're going to want. >> >> And given that the Turner division of TW *also *makes a lot of money >> through cable subscriptions, TW can't afford to annoy the cable companies >> *too* much. A higher price point means that cable companies can say they >> offer HBO cheaper. >> >> If it's only $10, then the 70m odd non-HBO homes that currently take >> cable TV, could buy the service cheaper direct from HBO than via Comcast >> etc. And you can be sure that this wouldn't make them happy. >> >> The question then is, how many households would cancel cable TV >> altogether, and just use a combination of free-to-air/Netflix/Hulu/HBO etc? >> Of course, for that, you still need the internet. And that probably means >> going to your cable company... >> >> >> >> Adam (who's overly curious about this stuff) >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 4:40 AM, M-D November <mdnov...@gmail.com >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> >>> HBO is using the phrase "over-the-top" in their PR - that's the same >>> language WWE used when launching the WWE Network earlier this year at CES. >>> That confirms that the online-only subscriptions will sidestep the >>> cable/satellite providers entirely. >>> >>> Cost is the huge unknown here. HBO will need to weigh their pricing >>> against Netflix and Hulu, and while the two existing services aren't >>> exactly carbon copies of HBO, potential customers will certainly make the >>> comparison anyway. (Oh, and Amazon, but not really.) The $8-9 price point >>> seems to be the sweet spot for online programming services (WWE comes in >>> higher at $9.99, but they've got a niche audience). Assuming HBOGo remains >>> the same as it is now (movie library + originals immediately after first >>> airing [except LWT] + library of old original series), a $9-10 price point >>> might be reasonable. But if the online subscription includes access to a >>> stream of the actual channels, I could see that price going up. >>> >>> I guess we'll see. >>> >>> On Wednesday, October 15, 2014 11:55:04 AM UTC-4, Brad Beam wrote: >>>> >>>> As long rumored, HBO will start offering online streaming service next >>>> year. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> How will it be distributed? Perhaps: >>>> >>>> (1) Through existing cable providers. >>>> >>>> (2) Through online providers (Amazon, Google, et al). >>>> >>>> (3) Directly to customers, like Netflix. >>>> >>>> http://insidetv.ew.com/2014/10/15/hbo-online-streaming-service/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _ _ >>>> >>>> |_>|_> Brad Beam- Belle WV >>>> >>>> |_>|_> http://www.facebook.com/74bmw >>>> >>> -- >>> -- >>> TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "TV or Not TV" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to tvor...@googlegroups.com >>> <javascript:> >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> tvornottv-...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "TVorNotTV" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to tvornottv+...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> > -- -- TV or Not TV .... The Smartest (TV) People! You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TV or Not TV" group. To post to this group, send email to tvornottv@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to tvornottv-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/tvornottv?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TVorNotTV" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to tvornottv+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
