>> Unless you know the keys to the records you're selecting, even the >> EXECUTE "SELECT ..." is going to have to read each record, how else >> would it know which records to throw out?
SELECT is definitely faster than EXECUTE "SELECT..." and I try and use it first. Charles Shaffer Senior Analyst NTN-Bower Corporation _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
