I don't know if I agree that SELECT is faster. If you are using indexed fields, SELECT is definitely not the good choice.
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 5:14 PM, <charles_shaf...@ntn-bower.com> wrote: >>> Unless you know the keys to the records you're selecting, even the >>> EXECUTE "SELECT ..." is going to have to read each record, how else >>> would it know which records to throw out? > > SELECT is definitely faster than EXECUTE "SELECT..." and I try and use it > first. > > Charles Shaffer > Senior Analyst > NTN-Bower Corporation > _______________________________________________ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > _______________________________________________ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
