Jelmer Vernooij wrote: > On Thu, 2009-12-17 at 19:41 -0600, John Arbash Meinel wrote: >>>> This would make the memory leaks less of >>>> a problem, and it should make the scheduling of code imports a bit >>>> fairer, since large branches would not keep the system busy for a long >>>> time. >>> It would also need some work so that we don't publish an import until >>> the import actually finishes, I think that would be quite confusing. > Is it really problematic if an import is behind on the foreign branch > while it is being filled in, rather than being empty as is the case now?
Hm, true. Some effort in the UI would probably make this ok. Cheers, mwh -- ubuntu-distributed-devel mailing list ubuntu-distributed-devel@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-distributed-devel
