I agree with Julien. Our purpose is to give a pure GNOME experience. The
average user doesn't care if they are using Totem or VLC, they want a Video
Player and they will most probably have only one video player installed.

On 26 June 2015 at 17:33, Julien Olivier <jul...@gmail.com> wrote:

>  Yes, sorry, my explanation lacked an important detail: I reckon the
> GNOME developers wanted to use generic names for first-party apps only (and
> thus, for one and only one app for each task). Third party apps are still
> displayed using their real name.
>
> I might be wrong though, or GNOME developers might also have changed their
> strategy since the last time I checked...
>
>
> Le vendredi 26 juin 2015 à 16:04 +0200, Narcis Garcia a écrit :
>
> I believe there is a middle point for this:
>
> "Gedit text editor"
> "Nautilus file manager"
> "Firefox web browser"
> etc.
>
> If someone names simply "Web browser" to Epiphany, how is named
> Firefox?? In a bad names strategy, user could see this in an
> applications menu:
> Web browser <- This is Firefox (you must know)
> Web browser <- This is Mirori (you must know)
> Web browser <- This is Icecat (you must know)
> ...no sense.
>
> It's very difficult for casual (or new) users this other extreme in a
> bad names strategy:
> Sylpheed <- This is an e-mail software (you must know)
> Evolution <- This is an e-mail software (you must know)
> Geary <- This is an e-mail software (you must know)
>
>
> El 26/06/15 a les 11:13, Julien Olivier ha escrit:> Hi Bart, list,> > the 
> thing with names is that it's better when they actually *mean*> something. An 
> experimented user will immediately know that Firefox is a> web browser or 
> that Evolution is an email program. But normal users will> have no clue about 
> it :) Some apps use names that provide clues as to> what the purpose of the 
> app is, like Rhythmbox or Gedit, but most don't.> > I think the recent trend 
> among GNOME developers is that the app name is> more like an internal code, 
> not aimed at being used in the user experience.> > Maybe a good way to fix 
> your problem would be to have a "Launch in> terminal" entry in the app's dash 
> icon, next to "New Window" and "Add to> favourites", possibly as a GNOME 
> Shell extension ?> > Le vendredi 26 juin 2015 à 10:25 +0200, Bart Schouten a 
> écrit :>> Quoting Narcis Garcia <informat...@actiu.net 
> <mailto:informat...@actiu.net <informat...@actiu.net>>>:>>>> > I agree with 
> Keith Grider in a subject: "please name all programs in the>> > UI the same 
> as the cli (...) if you want to diagnose the problem, you>> > need to grep 
> all over the internet to find out what the program name is>> > to be able to 
> launch from the command line to see what errors are occurring">> >>> > This 
> problem is worse with localized UI.>>>> Yes. It  makes  no sense to name 
> something "File Manager" instead of  >> "Nautilus" when Nautilus is a name 
> you can love and a brand name.  >> Kubuntu (KDE) just puts a like subtitle 
> next to the real name in the  >> menu to describe it. I don't think "File 
> Manager" (or whatever) makes  >> much sense and you cannot love it. Only the 
> most mediocre computer  >> users do not know what "file manager" or anything  
> with  a name is and  >> some of them don't even know what the button "web" is 
> supposed to do  >> (in a kiosk computer). You can't really cater to them. 
> Those users  >> can't use Linux anyway. People who have to learn how to use a 
> mouse  >> and who cannot make double-clicks without moving the mouse too much 
>  >> (it happens all too common). I don't think that should be your target  >> 
> audience. A proficient computer user that cannot use a mouse and does  >> not 
> know what a file manager icon is supposed to do -- they can never  >> use 
> linux. They couldn't use Windows. You'd only give them a Mac, at  >> best. I 
> feel it is catering to the lowest common denominator.>>>> Personally I think 
> Gnome would be at least twice as good if they got  >> rid of those confusing 
> names when there are good names for those  >> programs already.>>>> Just my 
> opinion, as well.>>>> Bart.>>>> >>> >>> >>> > El 25/06/15 a les 15:44, Keith 
> Grider ha escrit:>> >> Hi,>> >>>> >> I have been running Gnome desktop under 
> Ubuntu since 11.04. I did not>> >> like Unity and did not like the Gnome 
> fallback. Tried Elementary OS for>> >> a while and came back to Ubuntu Gnome 
> because they are so slow to>> >> release Freya.>> >>>> >> The new Gnome in 
> 15.04 seems snappier and I like it. I could care less>> >> about the cutting 
> edge, latest Gnome, I just want it to run. I am in the>> >> process of 
> upgrading my computers from 14.04 to 15.04. 2 down and 2 to>> >> go. There 
> are some kernel improvements in 15.04 which help a couple>> >> issues I was 
> having with 14.04 (1 is that network manager is somewhat>> >> broken in 
> 14.04.2 The via_velocity module will not reconnect to the lan>> >> after 
> suspend and another is with wifi on my laptop.)>> >>>> >> Stuff that does not 
> work or does not work 'correctly' in 15.04, IMO:>> >>>> >>  1. I can no 
> longer unload a module at suspend time. I know this is a>> >>     kernel 
> problem and not Gnome, but it is a problem for me. I used to>> >>     be able 
> to do this with 13.04, but since 12.04, I can no longer get>> >>     it to 
> unload the aic7xxx module before suspending. No matter what I>> >>     put in 
> the |/etc/pm/config.d/modules, it will not unload. As soon as>> >>     I try 
> to use that module, the kernel panics and locks up the>> >>     computer. It 
> is an old card, but runs my scanner just fine. It used>> >>     to work 
> correctly and now it only works after boot and crashes after>> >>     the 
> first suspend resume cycle. I can do it by hand and can also>> >>     
> blacklist it so I cna load it when I need it, but it should be able>> >>     
> to be automated, this is a regression.>> >>     |>> >>  2. ||The Gnome login 
> screen needs a suspend time out. As it is, I have>> >>     my users set auto 
> suspend after 30 minutes. It would be nice if I>> >>     could set that for 
> The Gnome login screen as well via the Gnome UI>> >>     somehow. It has been 
> this way for a while and it is a regression, IMO.>> >>  3. The Gnome login 
> screen does not have a suspend option. All I can do>> >>     is shut down or 
> reboot from the login screen.>> >>  4. The openjdk-*-jre install no longer 
> has a .desktop file for right>> >>     clicking and launching *.jar files in 
> Nautilus, it must be created>> >>     by hand to run these files.>> >>  5. 
> Please, please, please name all programs in the UI the same as the>> >>     
> cli... Please. It is tough to click and try to launch something in>> >>     
> the UI, have nothing happen then if you want to diagnose the>> >>     
> problem, you need to grep all over the internet to find out what the>> >>     
> program name is to be able to launch from the command line to see>> >>     
> what errors are occurring. I do not have a specific example right>> >>     
> now, but could find one if you need. I think one of them is 'files'.>> >>     
> Just call it 'nautilus'.>> >>>> >> Keep up the good work.>> >>>> >> Keith>> 
> >>>> >>>> >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Ali/amjjawad 
> <amjja...@gnome.org <mailto:amjja...@gnome.org <amjja...@gnome.org>>>> >> 
> <mailto:amjja...@gnome.org <amjja...@gnome.org>>> wrote:>> >>>> >>     Dear 
> everyone,>> >>>> >>     Before we start the planning for this cycle (Wily 
> Werewolf - 15.04),>> >>     I'd like to run this survey before anything 
> else:>> >>>> >>     https://ubuntugnome.org/feedback-time/>> >>>> >>     It 
> would be very important for me and everyone else to understand>> >>     what 
> we have done, what we are doing and what we are suppose to do>> >>     in the 
> future. Above all, we do need to understand what *OUR USERS*>> >>     think 
> :)>> >>>> >>     I am having very limited time to spend so if the survey is 
> bad or>> >>     lack some questions, etc .. please keep in mind that this is 
> what my>> >>     time allowed me to do. I think I did my best and I'd like 
> to>> >>     apologize in advance for any inconvenience.>> >>>> >>     You can 
> *ALWAYS* write to us and send your feedback here, on this>> >>     mailing 
> list:>> >>     https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuGNOME/ContactUs>> >>>> >>>> >>   
>   and/or *FEEL FREE to contact me* :)>> >>>> >>>> >>     The survey should 
> *NOT* take more than _*3 minutes*_ from your time.>> >>>> >>     *Here is the 
> direct link:*>> >>     http://goo.gl/forms/sXdsxPIkfZ>> >>>> >>     You can 
> only answer it ONE time so please, make sure to read the>> >>     questions 
> carefully ;)>> >>>> >>     Thank you so much!>> >>>> >>     -->> >>     
> Remember: "All of us are smarter than any one of us.">> >>>> >>     Best 
> Regards,>> >>     Ali/amjjawad <https://wiki.ubuntu.com/amjjawad>>> >>>> >>   
>   *http://kibo.computer* - http://torios.net - Ubuntu GNOME>> >>     
> <http://ubuntugnome.org/>>> >>>> >>     -->> >>     Ubuntu-GNOME mailing 
> list>> >>     Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com 
> <mailto:Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com <Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com>> 
> <mailto:Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com <Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com>>>> >>   
>   Modify settings or unsubscribe at:>> >>     
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> 
> >>> > -->> > Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list>> > Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com 
> <mailto:Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com <Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com>>>> > 
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:   >> > 
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome>> >>>>>>>>>> > >
>
>
>
> --
> Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
> Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome
>
>
-- 
Ubuntu-GNOME mailing list
Ubuntu-GNOME@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-gnome

Reply via email to