An afterthough, as usual: * Matthew East: > * Corey Burger: >> If spam did not exist I would agree with you. So better to have two >> lists, one to collect the original sending with a reply-to to the 2nd >> list, the actual main discussion list. > > Strongly disagree. Spam on open lists isn't actually a serious problem. > A reasonable spam filter will always get rid of the vast majority, and > in any case you can just ignore it. > > I certainly don't think it's worthwhile having two separate lists, which > is (a) confusing for newcomers, (b) annoying in terms of requiring > everyone to subscribe to two lists. After all, if *one* of your two > lists is open, then everyone has to deal with the spam anyway. Or had > you envisaged that some people would subscribe to one list, and others > to another? I just think this will create too many issues unnecessarily.
An idea might be to go with a single list, open to begin with. If people are willing to moderate the list so that genuine emails will go through, then I think we can switch it to moderation. This will be even easier when a webform is set up that can be accessed from the Fridge or the wiki. Matt -- http://www.mdke.org gnupg pub 1024D/0E6B06FF
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- ubuntu-marketing mailing list ubuntu-marketing@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-marketing
