"Christopher Swift" <christopher.sw...@linux.com> wrote:
>Ar Mer, 2010-06-16 am 17:24 -0400, ysgrifennodd Scott Kitterman: >> I get that you think it's OK to tell people who want to be a MOTU to go >> elsewhere if they express an interest in a KDE/Qt packages. >> >> I disagree. >> >> Scott K >> >Scott, in this conversation from what I have read in the thread all >that has happened is that the guy asking for help, shadeslayer, was >advised to hang out in #kubuntu-devel since that is the location where >people who can assist with KDE-related technical matters in Ubuntu are >most likely to be found in one place. The MOTU team is a great team for >assistance in packaging but if a specific KDE-related error popped up >then hanging out in both #kubuntu-devel & #ubuntu-motu would allow that >developer to get help and fix the problem much more easier since there >is a great pool of assistance to choose from. > >In my humble opinion, there is absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever with >recommending a developer/contributor to be in two related channels which >focus on two different aspects on which they will need to combine to do >their task most efficiently. This is a big case of something out of >nothing. > You're welcome to you're opinion. The problem is it's unrelated to what happened. He didn't ask for help with Qt packaging. He asked for help becoming a MOTU. If the situation were that he was asking for help with a specific package, then I would agree. Scott K -- Ubuntu-motu mailing list Ubuntu-motu@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-motu
