Hello Alberto, I really like the idea of a shorter manual for Bug Triaging, because the current one was hard to follow as a newbie. But I really dislike the way how you try to press others in accepting it as it is without modifications when writing this:
Am 28.05.2017 um 16:54 schrieb Alberto Salvia Novella: > So either you take it as it is, or you leave what you have. I will wait till > Sunday the 4th, to let you decide yourselves. I will take that resolution as > hard fact on what to expect in the future. This is not a good way to communicate with a team of volunteers. It also goes against the Ubuntu Code of Conduct [1]. So please sit back take a breath, drop that "everything or nothing"-approach and open yourself for discussion how to realize a clear manual without loosing details that some of us might need for their work (think about the Kernel Team as one example). I feel this is the only way your great goal of an easier manual might become reality. Best Regards Vej [1] "Our work will be used by other people, and we in turn will depend on the work of others. Any decision we take will affect users and colleagues, and we should consider them when making decisions." (Cited from the "Ubuntu Code of Conduct v2.0" -- Ubuntu-quality mailing list Ubuntu-quality@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-quality
