Hi, as of today I'm member of “Ubuntu Wiki Editors” team.
When editing Ubuntu Studio wikis, should we stay with apt-get or already use apt? The file list of precise [1] doesn't provide /usr/bin/apt but as of trusty [2] /usr/bin/apt is available and it already is the official recommended Ubuntu command line tool for package management. For Ubuntu wikis in general apt-get is more likely recommended, but some documentation already switched to apt. For other Ubuntu wikis I'll stay with apt-get, but IMO it make more sense to use apt for Ubuntu Studio. Or should we stay with apt-get? Regarding upstart vs systemd, I will describe both ways, how to manage services, for all Ubuntu related wikis. All subscribers be encouraged to join the “Ubuntu Wiki Editors” team, too. At https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-wiki-editors the box on the right side, provides a "Join the team"-link. For those with knowledge about Linux, English might not be the native language, so regarding the form of words proofread and correction is useful when done by inexperienced Linux users, too. Regards, Ralf [1] http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/amd64/apt/filelist http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise-updates/amd64/apt/filelist [2] http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty/amd64/apt/filelist http://packages.ubuntu.com/trusty-updates/amd64/apt/filelist -- ubuntu-studio-users mailing list ubuntu-studio-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-studio-users