On Thu, 7 May 2020 at 11:19, Paul Bone <paul@pmb.technology> wrote: > The example of Universities with a /16 that have not implemented IPv6 > because they have not needed to is just one example of the scale of the > problem. > > I'm interested to know which Universities have not implemented IPv6
I doubt there's a correlation between owning legacy IPv4 space and not implementing IPv6. The organisations I've dealt with who have no interest in IPv6 also have very little IPv4 address space and use RFC1918 extensively internally. The problem seems to be that networking is rarely their core function - they are in some other industry and the amount of expertise they have for networking is spread thin, which limits their ability to embrace change. Their engineers don't attend UKNOF, they aren't in our sphere of influence, they barely realise IPv6 is a thing - to them it's some research project that someone mentioned once. Until their customers demand it, they won't react. They might as well engrave "If it aint broke, don't fix it" on their computer room door. it sucks for new entrants to the ISP industry. Sorry. Aled
