At 21:47 -0800 2002-03-10, Doug Ewell wrote: >You do realize, of course, that any sort of work done with Old Persian >Cuneiform based on N1639 should be limited to laboratory >experimentation. Not only is this script not in Unicode, it's been >relegated to the "under investigation" list, a pool of quicksand from >which few scripts have ever been rescued.
That isn't true. They get rescued. It just takes time and resource to do it. >The fact that there's a block in the Roadmap for Old Persian Cuneiform >starting at U+103A0 is no guarantee of anything. Please don't >distribute keyboards or anything else using this proposed encoding, at >least not until it comes *much* closer to acceptance. I agree completely! -- Michael Everson *** Everson Typography *** http://www.evertype.com
