On Sun, Mar 10, 2002 at 09:47:50PM -0800, Doug Ewell wrote: > You do realize, of course, that any sort of work done with Old Persian > Cuneiform based on N1639 should be limited to laboratory > experimentation. Not only is this script not in Unicode, it's been > relegated to the "under investigation" list, a pool of quicksand from > which few scripts have ever been rescued.
I've have a question, as much for Michael Everson as anyone else. How do you rescue a script that has a proposal but hasn't had any action in 5 years? One of my friends was asking about Hungarian Runic, and all I could suggest was getting the Hungarian standards body to take up the cause. -- David Starner - [EMAIL PROTECTED] "It's not a habit; it's cool; I feel alive. If you don't have it you're on the other side." - K's Choice (probably refering to the Internet)
