> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
> Behalf Of Michael Everson
> Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2004 10:13 AM
> At 09:49 -0800 2004-03-18, Mike Ayers wrote:
>
> >Whoops! We forgot step 0, "Verify that it is in fact a
> >character"[1]. This is where you should have stopped, as the glyph
> >in question is used in the unique composition of exactly no words.
> >It's a symbol, not a character.
>
> Lots of symbols are characters.
Not that one, though.
/|/|ike
