At 09:49 -0800 2004-03-18, Mike Ayers wrote:

Whoops! We forgot step 0, "Verify that it is in fact a character"[1]. This is where you should have stopped, as the glyph in question is used in the unique composition of exactly no words. It's a symbol, not a character.

Lots of symbols are characters. -- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com



Reply via email to