|
Dan wrote:
>If there are an avarage of 5 housing units
in every rental house or
>building (and it's probably higher) that would
make almost 36% of
>the buildings in the area owner occupied.
Dan's is an interesting question. I do not believe
that the US Census Bureau provides the answers, though. Certainly it doesn't
attempt that in the Decennial Census, which is a census of people rather than of
structures. I know there are agencies that need to count buildings,
however -- probably city agencies. Can anybody give us some leads?
But this question too is of limited interest. Say
my owner-occupied house is one building, the identical house next door which is
divided into 5 apartments is one building, and the Fairfax is one building. So
what? Vastly more bricks went into the Fairfax than into my house; in what
meaningful way do we each "count as one"? The building next door is housing more
people per brick than mine is; does that mean it lowers the neighborhood's tone
by increasing density, or combats global warming by increasing
efficiency?
One should also remember that a large percentage of
owner-occupied housing units in this neighborhood *also* contain renters. So it
is mathematically inaccurate to contrast "rental" vs. "owner occupied"
buildings; there is overlap.
-- Tony West
|
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the issue weigh... Dan & Karla
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the issue ... R a y R o r k e
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the issue ... Anthony West
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the issue ... john
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the issue ... R a y R o r k e
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the is... R a y R o r k e
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the is... Kirk Wattles
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the is... William H. Magill
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in th... Jennifer Rodriguez
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the issue ... john
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the is... R a y R o r k e
- Re: [UC] Another party with no stake in the is... William H. Magill
