The Mage wrote: > No. And I don't remember it *ever* being noticeably faster, with > everyday apps at least, on any OS, from 7.5 to 10.2 -- you are always > left wondering if you might be just imagining a slight improvement > because you want it to happen, and that might please some people, but > personally that's not what I call noticeable. There would have to be no > doubt in my mind for me to call it that. However, I wouldn't say that I > absolutely couldn't see a difference, either. But with only 20% > interleaved there is not even a hint of a difference.
You're also running a memory starved system with old, slow 2K refresh DIMMS; your OS doesn't even fit in the interleaved portion of the memory. I'll wager you're also running VM because you have to. Get 2 or 4 128 mb sticks, as the only memory. Try an interleaving test then, you Will notice a difference. -- Bruce Johnson University of Arizona College of Pharmacy Information Technology Group Institutions do not have opinions, merely customs -- Unsupported OS X is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html> Unsupported OS X list info <http://lowendmac.com/lists/unsupported.html> --> AOL users, remove "mailto:"; Send list messages to: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To unsubscribe, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Archive <http://www.mail-archive.com/unsupportedosx%40mail.maclaunch.com/> Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com
